Skip to content

This is but the start…

05/30/2009

Osamabama LIED?!?! Heavens to Betsy, NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!11!!ONE!!!

from → History, Miserable Communist POS, Patriotism, Politics, Sedition, Simple reality, Treasonous Pigs
5 Comments
  1. LC Aggie Sith permalink
    05/30/2009 14:50

    Number 7…I will say that one made me laugh. But number 6….that one made me angry. Juxtapose that quote:

    – “Second is recognition of the limits of the judicial role, an understanding that a judge’s job is to interpret, not make law, to approach decisions without any particular ideology or agenda, but rather a commitment to impartial justice…”–

    With these:

    –”We need somebody who’s got the heart to recognize — the empathy to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old. And that’s the criteria by which I’m going to be selecting my judges.”– July 17th, 2007

    –”"I would not appoint somebody who doesn’t believe in the right to privacy. … I taught constitutional law for 10 years, and when you look at what makes a great Supreme Court justice, it’s not just the particular issue and how they ruled. But it’s their conception of the court. And part of the role of the court is that it is going to protect people who may be vulnerable in the political process, the outsider, the minority, those who are vulnerable, those who don’t have a lot of clout. … Sometimes we’re only looking at academics or people who’ve been in the courts. If we can find people who have life experience, and they understand what it means to be on the outside, what it means to have the system not work for them, that’s the kind of person I want on the Supreme Court.”– November 15th, 2007

    And the most damning one of all:

    –”…the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society.

    To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.”– Radio interview, 2001

    ANYONE who still thinks this man has no agenda for the SCOTUS is stupid, lying, or deaf.

  2. cmblake6 permalink*
    05/30/2009 14:58

    I’ll take a & b for $500.

  3. hoosierarmymom permalink
    05/30/2009 20:27

    Well said. The woman has NO PLACE in judicial jurisprudence, let’s send her butt to Cuba!!! I am just about sick of this Obama crap!

  4. cmblake6 permalink*
    05/30/2009 20:39

    All we have to do is prove his illegitimacy and we’re good. Nothing he has signed is valid, he’s in jail, voila!

  5. FreedomFighter permalink
    05/30/2009 20:56

    Good luck on the last post, you know as well as i do that his administration is doing everything to keep this info surpressed.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 64 other followers