Ad on Fox News
About Cavuto tomorrow. All about “Does the GOP need a real CONSERVATIVE to run for POTUS in 2012″. In a word, YES!
We need to take back Congress next year, and we need real Honest To GOD CONSERVATIVES in the White House and the rest of Congress election after that.
This socialism that’s been foist upon us since, shit, the 1930′s has to be gutted. We need a government that will take EVERYTHING done to this country since then, review its Constitutionality, and void anything that doesn’t follow the Founding Fathers purposes.
SCOTUS for life or until voluntary retirement? Other than impeachment for un-Constitutional behavior? Go for it. Incorporating foreign law into American decisions is not on. American crime? American law.
This nation MUST return to its pre-eminent position as THE land of freedom, THE top producer, THE biggest baddest strongest military on the face of the Earth. The socialists, the liberals, the “progressives”, have cost us that position. We need to get it back.
Help those who cannot help themselves. Fuck those who will not help themselves. There will be jobs. Remove the illegals. Prices will go down if the production is high and the lawyers are controlled. So many organizations are for the sole purpose of the destruction of this nation by using its own laws against it. Those laws, or many of them, were put there ahead of time to use for that specific purpose. Review everything, delete that which does not pass the test.
Remember “All men are created equal”? That said it all right there, doesn’t need to have anything added. Did at the time, yes. Not now. No prejudice, or reverse prejudice. There will be jobs. Best qualified gets them. Simple. High score wins.
How hard is that? Schools are available, training will be in the necessary educational standards. You’re very smart? Further education for the real heavy duty brain stuff. Not that bright? There are things that don’t require some too many brames.
Comments are closed.
And in both 2010 and 2012, flush any House Representative, or Senator who has tended to vote for bills that are not constitutionally sound. It’ll be a pretty easy choice, since most laws don’t qualify in a strict comparison to what the government is actually permitted to do under the Constitution. They’ve just gotten away from it and have woven an intertwined web of these bad laws in with the good ones.
One last thing the USA really, really needs: An amendment to clarify the exact scope and meaning of the “Interstate Commerce” clause. It’s been used as a catch-all for so many laws (usually in a “really stretching to get there” manner), that it’s one of the few loose-spots in the Constitution that should be firmly tightened and defined.
Imdeed. Like I said, pure originalist intent.
My favorite piece of this (though it’s all good):
“Help those who cannot help themselves. Fuck those who will not help themselves. “
Always been my philosophy.
Well, we shall see what happens. In other news, speaking of
Democratic Party…the socialist/progressive… what the hell, who am I kidding, the f-ing Communistic bastards on the Hill in DC (and all their little RINO butt buddies) will be doing the “happy dance” tomorrow, as Pelosi’s HealthCare Plan is made public (at least the parts we are being allowed to look at).Me thinks it’s gonna get a whole lot uglier, before 2010 even gets here, let alone 2013. Keep your powder dry!!
And your blade sharp.
I pick up number seven Wednesday. Seemed as fitting as any name for my newest acquisition. A real purty Savage bolt action twenty-two with the cutest little banana clip. Oops, magazine. My daughter, presently afraid of guns thanks to liberal educational indoctrination, has seen my love for them, how I got my wife hooked on them, and has been afraid of the more powerful ones. Soooooo, she says she wants to fire it. And I am fucking elated! But I’m keeping number seven. I haven’t owned a twenty-two since high school. It will fit right in with the Marlin, the two shotguns and three pistols….and in the back of my beady little brain a plot is hatching to have her fire thirty-eight specials from the wifes three fifty-seven.. In time, in time…..
Indeed, in time.
But do you have anything in a more serious social caliber like .308? Mossberg and Savage both make some nice, inexpensive hunting rifles. And there is a whole lot to be said for things like surplus Mausers. They can be had in a myriad of calibers, some more available than others. 8×57 is plentiful surplus, and potent. Anything in the lower 48 is well within its capabilities. A “Spanish” Mauser in .308 is easier to find ammo for even than that, albeit a touch more expensive. Mosin-Nagants are everywhere, ammo is cheaper and more plentiful than 8×57, and the horsepower is definitely there! And a good example is still way cheap.
What I do have is an 1894 Marlin lever action .44 mag. I’ve been told devastating at close range, but only close range. I am investigating another rifle…..
Something in the 600+ yard capable range. I’m telling you bro, M-N is very hard to go wrong with. That Marlin will be EXCELLENT up close, but sometimes it’s better to “reach out”. And for the food purpose, rarely will you get a short range shot at game. Back East, in NC, there were many. Out here in the West? Not so much. Hogs, yes. Antelope, no. Elk, no.