Anderson Cooper shitting self. What ails these people?
04/24/2010
If he’s clean, he’s clean. Why spend $1.7 MILLION dollars on lawyers to block shit if you’re clean?
10 Comments
Comments are closed.
If he’s clean, he’s clean. Why spend $1.7 MILLION dollars on lawyers to block shit if you’re clean?
Comments are closed.

Theme: Vigilance by The Theme Foundry.
How could this possibly be considered unconstitutional when the US Constitution defines the criteria by which a candidate for the Office of the Presidency is qualified to do so? If the federal government would simply FOLLOW the Constitution, then half the crap being passed by the states in the last year would not be happening.
Absolutely correct. The Fed is so polluted with power mad criminals and communist plants it’s insane. Rather than educate the children in school about the Constitution, as it was when I was young, they have done everything in their power to degrade knowledge. Where once we were at the top of the list in all levels of education, we are now near the bottom in all fields. The Soviet Union did a fine job in their efforts to infiltrate. And even if they did collapse, their programming of our youth starting in the ’60s took on a life of its own. We see the results all around us.
I couldn’t get past the half way point on the video. Cooper’s sanctimoniousness, along with his willful misuse of the language (a COLB is NOT the same thing as a legitimate Birth Certificate), his implying that Obama being “an American” is the same thing as being qualified to set as President of the United States … you get the idea. What bothers me perhaps even more, was the Az representative was not able to come back on any of the above points to shut this asshat up. He was playing right into Anderson’s hand.
Why couldn’t one of us “netizens”, who in Anderson’s eyes at least, are responsible for the dissemination of this “misinformation about the President”, be asked to speak on his show. I think we would give a much better response to his questions.
Is Gran’ma the conspirator in chief’s conspirator in chief?
Old news, but then, so’s this case.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Blogs/Message.aspx/3074
Excellent article, Cheapshot!
Gee, I had to prove I was eligible for my the job I was seeking with a government contractor. I had to show a birth certificate, a driver’s license, a social security card, and I had to be fingerprinted, and a background check was performed on me. I had to prove I was a US Citizen. Obama NEVER had to go thru any of this, and he just sits there so damed smug it is irritating. I would love to slap that assinine grin off his ugly face!!!
Madalyn
Outstanding observation. And complete truth. Again: What ails these people? Should be simple enough answering these questions, but they fight tooth and nail to block them.
That guy’s an aasshat. He let Cooper browbeat him for far too long. MAN UP!
Here’s how I would have handled it:
“Hey Anderson. If you have to produce a birth certificate to get a driver’s license why shouldn’t you have to produce it to get the Presidency? STFU you cocksmoking liberal shill.” (Rips off mic and walks off set.)
I remember back in 1980, my first semester in college, when my political science “professor”, Dr. Katsikas (bitch, whore, slut), claimed that “Communism is the purist form of government.” She went one to try and passionately prove it to us. At the end of the 100 minute lecture the mumbles amongst the student body as we were leaving was incredible – many claiming that they would be dropping the course immediately.
Me? I went straight to take care of that very task. I saw two others in line from the same class. I don’t know how many actually bugged out, because I never returned. However, as a fraternity prank several weeks later, we streaked the lobby and corridors outside her lecture room. Yes, we were streaking in 1980.
A couple semesters later…read more here…
http://empiricalsnark.blogspot.com/2010/04/story-of-us.html
Good answer, Woody.
And my streaking days were in the 70′s Grackle. Ah, the U of F “streak in” 73 was fun. As for the “purest form of government”? Allowing for no personal excellence or growth, true enough. That is exactly what makes it a negative for humankind.