Skip to content

They cannot afford for the truth to be known

06/28/2010

So they attack, ala Alinsky, Cloward-Piven, Marx, etc.

4 Comments
  1. 06/28/2010 20:26

    While I firmly believe that he is not truly a US citizen (there’s no other possible conclusion for the reasons behind his evasions) I have to wonder why people are still pursuing it. The success of the lies are already fait accompli, and at this stage nothing is going to change it.

  2. 06/28/2010 20:46

    Do. Not. Surrender. Do. Not. Give. Up.

  3. fxpcpa permalink
    06/29/2010 05:46

    Lemur King

    It is worth pursuing because it sets a bad precedent and you know how liberals ,once they get a situation that they like, love to spout out notions like stare decisis to keep the ground they’ve won.

    It doesn’t matter(to them) that every other outcome since the beginning of the republic cuts against them if they get that one decision that supports their cause it immediately and irrevocably becomes immutable law.

    This combined with the fact that Obama was not forced to divulge many pertinent facts about his background by a credulous and obsequious media should be corrected by putting as much pressure on this poser as possible to cough up information that all other candidates of recent vintage had to cough up.

    Too often the left contradicts our assertions without proof long enough for a situation to become normalized. Then when we get the evidence that it was as we said it was they change the argument to “it doesn’t matter”.

    In this case it does. Prominently.

    If he is not eligible it becomes a legislative and administrative nightmare as every piece of legislation signed and orders given become void. Not that I would mind but it creates many problems we shouldn’t have to worry about.

    And most importantly being a natural born citizen is a constitutional requirement( I know you know wasn’t meant to be lecturing). We can’t let the statists to pick and choose what provisions they want to follow or allow them to make specious interpretations of constitutional precepts.

    We have to take back the terms of the debate.

  4. 06/29/2010 07:18

    Simply enough put, we need to pound back. Not as hard as they have to bring us to this ruination, but harder to fix it.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers