And this one.
This one MUST go up before I fold, and I’m wobbling. Arizona’s SB 1070 goes into effect tomorrow! And just what do you expect is happening there?
Meanwhile, President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have not backed from their threats against the state of Arizona.
Last Thursday, public-interest attorneys filed a “motion to intervene” on behalf of Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of Arizona’s new illegal immigration law SB 1070, in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit challenging the law, which is set to take effect on July 29.
Ain’t it GREAT! Our “Glorious Messiah” is still forgetting a little something about what he was supposed to have been a professor of.
Meanwhile, in another disgraceful example of the Obama Administration’s hostility toward enforcing illegal immigration law the Obama Justice Department announced this week that illegal immigration sanctuary cities can continue their illegal behavior without fear of prosecution.
Isn’t there an Article in the Constitution specifically about that sort of thing? One that the DoJ is directly in violation of there? Yes, actually, there is. Article 4, section 4:
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Now, dare we look at Article 2, section 4?
Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
We talked about that last post. But, can we fix all this? YES WE CAN! Maybe even without resorting to violence. We’ll see.
Well, we also have some really, REALLY hopeful news on the SCOTUS front. Am I wrong, or do we NOT want Elena Kagan on the Supreme Court? Or, if she does somehow get there, get her the fuck right back out?
One of Washington D.C.’s most feared and fearlesscorruption watchers has told WND he intends to file an ethics complaint to have Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan disbarred from practicing before the court she aspires to join – and possibly subjected to criminalprosecution – for her role in an escalating controversy over partial-birth abortion.
Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch USA, is bringing the complaint, alleging Kagan altered an official scientific report used as evidence by the Supreme Court to persuade the justices to overturn bans on partial-birth abortion.
Oh yeah, this guy is good. Real good.
He is still known in Washington as the biggest enemy of the city’s elite, having made a name for himself suing Bill and Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and foreign dictators such as Castro, Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. His battles against corruption in the Clinton administration became so well-known that a character in the hit TV series “West Wing” was based on him, Harry Klaypool.
The only one I can think of better would have been FRED! He’s the only lawyer so good he had to play himself in the movie about him.
Comments are closed.
cmblake, this is off the topic, but you might like to pop over and take a gander at this:
http://fountainabbey.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/fun-with-zombies/
The federal judge granted a temporary injuction staying the implementation of the main enforcement provision of SB 1070 in what can only be classified as total ignorance of both Federal immigration law and Constitutional law as to the Federal governments responsibility to uphold it’s end of the social contract vis a vis protecting the state from invasion and the state’s rights when the Federal goverment is malfeasant in performing it’s duty under the constitution.
This judge is a Clinton appointee who by definition only has a cursory idea of what the constitution says and that idea is that the Federal government is able to exercise arbitrary and unlimited power. It also means she is common sense challenged and intellectually deficient. Any one who can read english can tell this law was not pre-emptory unless,now, pre-empt means exactly matches. The constitution does not preclude local enforcement of Federal law in fact it requires it as the Fed has no constitutionally constructed police function.
Lawless congress.Lawless executive. Lawless judges. We live in a dictatorship at the present moment as the ruling class does as it damn well pleases.The law mean nothing to these people as they make it up as they go along diminshing our freedom daily.
The other shoe is about to drop.
PS I have a letter I sent to my congresscritter this morning. It is long so I will ask your permission to post it and touches on some of this.
curtalfriar
Love it. Now that’s a weapon.
Dear Friend!
If you like a military history, you can see my blog “Contemporary Military Historian” with URL adress: http://kotenikkote.wordpress.com/
Best wishes
Nick
Indeed, the Fed has been guilty of dereliction of duty. Intentional dereliction. Another crime.