Skip to content

Very good question

01/30/2011

From over at The Sipsey Street Irregulars.

David Codrea asks the pertinent question, “What do sporting purposes have to do with the Second Amendment?”

Answer? Not a GOD damned thing. Remember the thing about Dodd and the NAZI laws?

Also from there, you may find this enlightening. You want a “well regulated militia”? Fine, here you go.

Advertisement
3 Comments
  1. 01/30/2011 06:30

    I just went through the CCW class. I really need to get out and shoot more, I haven’t been to the range in a couple of months and it really showed (much to my embarrassment).

  2. Dr. Jeff permalink
    01/30/2011 07:25

    “Sporting purposes” are a nice side benefit of the 2nd Amendment.

    One more time:

    Without the Right of Self Defense AND the means to carry it out, you have no rights at all. That’s a little more fundamental than the 1st Amendment.

  3. 01/30/2011 09:51

    What greater sport is there? And yes, Larry, happens to what were once the greatest of us. Luckily it’s only surface rust that polishes off quite quickly.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers