Several of the “Accumulated over the days” links.
Starting with Warrantone girl. Excellent post that I don’t want to try to cheapen. Go read, and the comments.
This one is a history lesson from a friend:
Subject: History Lesson
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older
ones) didn’t know this.
It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and
show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what
and it doesn’t matter
whether you are a Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.Social Security Cards up until the 1980′s expressly stated the
number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it
became convenient to use it anyway and the message,
NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.An old Social Security card with the NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION
message.
Our Social SecurityFranklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntaryNo longer Voluntary
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 if their annual
Incomes into the Program,Now 7.65%
on the first $90,0003.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,Under Johnson the money was moved to
The General Fund and Spent5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be
taxed
as income.Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be TaxedSince many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month—
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put
away’— you may be interested in the following:__________________________________________________________
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general
fund so that Congress could spent it?A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.____________________________________________________
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?A: The Democratic Party.
_____________________________________________________
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Securiy annuities?A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
‘tie–breaking’ deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US_____________________________________________________
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?AND MY FAVORITE:
A: Thats right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
DEMOCRATIC PARTY gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!______________________________________________________
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want
to take your Social Security away!And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness
will be planted and maybe changes will evolve.
But it’s worth a try.How many people can YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
Thought you MIGHT like that in its entirety. Present from a good friend, one to share. Kinda makes you wonder where our money goes, dunn’it?
Now, let us take a peek at another piece of our favorite quandary. Where WAS he born?
The Obama birth letter first surfaced when then-Rep. Neil Abercrombie unveiled at a Kapi’olani centennial dinner held Jan. 24, 2009, a letter supposedly written by Obama that same day. The letter, on White House stationery, declared Kapi’olani was the hospital where the president was born.
As WND reported, on the same day, Abercrombie’s congressional website posted a notice describing Obama’s letter as “what is believe to be one of the first messages of congratulations” written by Obama after taking office as president only a few days earlier.
Kapiolani published the Obama letter in the spring issue of its Inspire Magazine, using it to solicit donations.
The controversy began in July 2009, when WND analyzed the Obama letter and found that the letter as published by the hospital was not a picture of an actual paper letter but a computer-created likeness.
Within an hour after WND broke the story in July 2009 that the Obama letter the hospital had posted for six months on its website was electronic in composition, Kapi’olani removed the letter from its website without explanation.
Hmmm. Not to mention,what kinda questionable behavior is that? Writing a letter to a hospital thanking them for being where you were born? You know what, I’ve never heard of that before. All this WTBC, gets elected, and writes letter. Letter turns out to be computer photoshop. Then it turns out he starts claiming it was the other hospital after all, neither of whom have any record.
When WND White House correspondent Les Kinsolving asked presidential Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about the Obama letter to Kapi’olani on July 13, 2009, Gibbs dodged the question, refusing to confirm its authenticity, while belittling Kinsolving for even posing the question.
WND also reported that before WND began reporting the Abercrombie-displayed letter from the White House, Obama’s birth hospital was widely reported as a different facility, Queens Medical Center in Honolulu.
So, which was it? Why is this such a confusion? If he had a birth certificate, wouldn’t it say right there on it? Again, hmmm.
For another little something you knew was a scam, how about this for some education. Well, you knew the whole purpose of the greenies was to destroy all human life. What is it about these idiots? Why don’t they lead the way, if their purpose is genetic suicide?
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colourless, non-toxic natural gas occurring in trace amounts in our atmosphere. It is crucial to all life on earth. Plants extract CO2 from the air and all animals get their carbon based proteins, sugars and fats from plants.
CO2 is also the source of that other crucial gas of life – oxygen. Plants use solar energy and the magic of photosynthesis to extract carbon from carbon dioxide and release the oxygen back to the air. Human activity completes the carbon cycle of life by burning the carbon food and fuels for energy and releasing CO2 back to the atmosphere.
Currently for every million molecules of air there are about 390 molecules of CO2 – a tiny amount which is almost the lowest it has ever been in the long history of the planet. At just 150 parts per million, plants starve and plant growth ceases. Most life probably evolved at levels of 1,000 ppm or more. The dinosaurs flourished in air with 1,800 ppm of CO2. 400 million years ago, life flourished with 4,500 ppm CO2. US Submariners live comfortably in air with 8,000 ppm and human lungs exhale air with 40,000 ppm.
At what level does this gas of life morph into “pollution” and attract a carbon tax?
The question is its own answer. They’re trying to exploit a natural cycle, and they’re trying to kill us by attempting to speed up that cycle. Hell, the more co2 we produce, the longer we continue to exist!
And I’ll just throw in this Soetoro link for you to peruse at your leisure. It is time to go get my truck back from the shop. Hopefully she’ll add to the pollution levels and save our lives!
Comments are closed.


If Obombya released his b/c, he’d have to be removed from office and the Dems who vetted him would wind up in jail–a happy ending to his little Red book.
Oh, indeed! Wouldn’t that be wonderful!?!? And every piece of paper he’s signed declared null and void!
I think you need to read this
Okay Deej. And Snopes would never steer us wrong, now would they?