Skip to content

Night off, slept a bit earlier, but it’s catching up.

09/25/2011

So, since I want to build up my sleep cushion, I’m about to fold for the night. Before I do, I want to share this thing I found about the EPA, and how it is the tool of the oppressor. It is way beyond time to tighten the leash on these over the top pieces of tyrannical insanity.

I’m just going to let you read the article, and I might suggest the comments as well, because they’ve been doing it for quite some time now. One “tasty” clip, just to show you how mad these animals have been allowed to become:

Just imagine. You want to build a home, so you buy a $23,000 piece of land in a  residential subdivision in your hometown and get started. The government then  tells you to stop, threatens you with $40 million in fines and is not  kidding.

That’s the case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, with briefs being filed  today by the Pacific Legal Foundation  on behalf of a Priest Lake, Idaho, family, Chantell and Mike Sackett.

Attorney Damien Schiff, who will be arguing before the high court in the  case, said it’s simply a case of a government run amok, and it poses a potential  threat to perhaps not every landowner across the nation, but untold millions.

A tiny bit more, just to reflect the actual madness here, and to show you how they’re allowed to fuck with the people in an un-constitutional manner:

The case developed when the Sacketts bought a .63-acre parcel of land for  $23,000 in a subdivision in their hometown of Priest Lake, Idaho. The land is  500 feet from a lake, had a city water and sewer tap assigned, had no running or  standing water and was in the middle of other developed properties.

The couple obtained all of the needed permits for their project and started  work. Suddenly, the Environmental Protection Agency showed up on the building  site, demanded that the work stop and issued a “compliance order” that the  couple remove the fill they had brought in, restore the land to its native  condition, plant trees every 10 feet, fence it off and let it sit for three  years.

What in the world could this possibly be? An example of tyrannical over reach?

EPA has got to go. They’ve involved themselves in entirely too much, for absolutely no valid reason. They do shit like this just to show the public that they have bigger dicks than you do.

ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

5 Comments
  1. 09/25/2011 07:12

    Insanity!
    Bob A.

  2. FX Phillips permalink
    09/25/2011 07:33

    Nothing about what EPA or their co=conspirators over in the Department of (lack of)Energy does is lawful or honest.

    They will lie as Clarice over at American Thinker discloses about water diversion in the California central valley The article itself is about the Solyndra fraud so eagerly promoted by the regime.

    [Judge] Wanger was angered by testimony from the two scientists, Frederick V. Feyrer and Jennifer M. Norris, that he said was “false,” “contradictory,” and “misleading.” He accused the Interior Department of “bad faith” in providing the two scientists as experts and claimed that their testimony was “an attempt to mislead and to deceive the court into accepting not only what is not the best science, it’s not science.” [Source: Washington Examiner.]

    By all means click on the links in Ms Feldman’s story as they give a little more background on this latest dishonest malfeasance of a rouge agency that sets the agenda of an unscrupulous zealots above the well being of ordinary Americans.

    Or maybe you remember this oldie but goodie

    Or perhaps you may remember this of more recent vintage

    Or the self anointed saint of the Church of AGW having to recant his false prophesy.

    They want to control the means of production. They do not care what lies they have to tell. They don’t care who they have to impoverish as long as their self righteous delusion of morality are assuaged.

    Their ideology informs them that they are the anointed ones and should make the decisions for us unenlightened trogs.

    We demand by what authority they impose their will. They scream “Off with their heads”.

    We demand evidence. They insist the science is settled.

    So was Einstein theory of special relativity until the scientists at CERN continued to inquire.

    From a Hugh Hewitt interview with Mark Steyn

    Hugh Hewitt:… Mark, the biggest news of the day comes out of Geneva in Italy[sic], where the CERN scientists have announced they’ve discovered a particle that is faster than the speed of light. I suppose this will be useful in measuring market drops, but it also says it would, “undermine Albert Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity, which says the speed of light is a cosmic constant, and nothing in the universe can travel faster.” Very unnerving, Mark, when you start the day knowing that Einstein was wrong?

    Steyn: The science was settled. It’s odd the way science is never settled, really, in that sense. And it’s interesting, I mean, I find that fascinating, because obviously, there’s a scientific consensus on all kinds of things, and then some non-consensual scientist comes along and blows the thing out of the water. And that really gets to the heart of the perversion of science that’s gone on by Al Gore. Actually, I don’t know what’s the opposite, the scientific…and I hasten to add, I am not a scientist, so I don’t know what the scientific opposite of something that is faster, a particle that moves faster than the speed of light. But I think the speed at which Al Gore’s ratings dropped during his 24 hour webcast global telethon is probably the precise scientific opposite of this new particle.

    Go here for the entire bi-play.

    Steyn has the best of it when he says: “That anyone that says the science is settled is everything but a scientist”.

    But back on point. The idea of administrative law is anathema to the separation of powers that the constitution was designed to implement. Agencies that act in the scope that EPA and various others concocted by either executive fiat or legislative negligence are invalid. They exist under a patina of legality that is not supported in the governing documents. They have no legal authority to pass their own “laws” and legitimize them buy coloring them as “regulation”. If the the rule acts upon the population at large it is properly the province of the legislative branch. The congress has no authority to delegate this power to anyone else.

    As usual it is the ruling class that thinks they and their band of thieves do not have to obey the rule of law but are the rule of law.

  3. FX Phillips permalink
    09/25/2011 07:40

    Way off topic but this just in.

    The Herminator wins the Florida straw poll !!!!

    There is hope yet for our country!!!!

  4. 09/26/2011 12:32

    Agreed. This s the dude I want in control of the reins. Cain/Perry? Cain/Bolton!

  5. FX Phillips permalink
    09/26/2011 12:48

    I like Cain/Bolton. Not a lot of nonsense there.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 64 other followers