Maybe. Maybe THIS will work

I don’t know how well this will work, but it might. Read this, see what you think. Not even calling FOR the BC, but it is calling for accountable entities to be held responsible for the certifications.

“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues
are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that
the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two
parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s
birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a
natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” the group said.

 The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.

That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born
citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with
the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was
never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its
citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives
or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

“There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama’s occupancy in
the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn’t eligible
because he wasn’t born in Hawaii as he’s said, or that he was never qualified
because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship
(the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the
Founders, with their requirement that the president be a “natural-born citizen,”
disqualified dual citizens.

Who knows. Whatever happens, we MUST get the research done and the votes cast. Whoever you’re for, research and vote.

Advertisement