Skip to content

It would appear to me

03/10/2013

To be time to arrest these “lawmakers”. Just jack them right the fuck up. There are undoubtedly laws, gather the intel, file the charges, and arrest them. Two of the charges are right there in the tags, subversion and sedition. Then you have the extortion and blackmail charges open.

16 Comments
  1. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 13:40

    We do have a legal remedy:
    18 USC § 2382 – MISPRISION OF TREASON

    USC-prelim
    US Code
    Notes
    Currency

    This preliminary release may be subject to further revision before it is released again as a final version. As with other online versions of the Code, the U.S. Code Classification Tables should be consulted for the latest laws affecting the Code. Those using the USCPrelim should verify the text against the printed slip laws available from GPO (Government Printing Office), the laws as shown on THOMAS(a legislative service of the Library of Congress), and the final version of the Code when it becomes available.

    Current through Pub. L. 112-90. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

    It can be filed through two entities:

    The Provost Marshall, and read below:
    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2382

  2. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 13:41

    The House and Senate are to be held responsible for NOT stopping him.

  3. poetopoet permalink
    03/10/2013 15:16

    upaces88: You are so right. Now with the turncoats who call themselves the GOP, I very much favor a third party, but I have been told they wrote some laws forbidding a third run.

    upaces88: Do you of such a law or rule?

  4. 03/10/2013 22:09

    Indeed, upaces. Guilty.

  5. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 22:14

    I may be misunderstanding you, Poet. IF you are asking me about the “3rd” term?
    I, honestly, don’t know if it is a LAW or ???
    I have always believed that a sitting President can only serve TWO Terms.

  6. 03/10/2013 22:17

    At the moment, yes. The left has been trying to remove the 22nd Amendment for a lot of years.

  7. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 22:18

    Found it:
    22nd amendment says “…No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of…

  8. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 22:19

    Poet HE COULD NOT GET AWAY WITH EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE…..if not with the approval OR passive behavior of those in the House and Senate.

  9. 03/10/2013 22:22

    True that.

  10. 03/10/2013 22:23

    That’s the one, and that’s why they’re trying to amend it.

  11. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 22:31

    If they are trying to amend it now? They already tried that a couple of years ago, and it didn’t pass.
    It will be a disaster if they pass it now!

  12. 03/10/2013 22:41

    I think it’s actually 20 plus years, they’ve been trying it every few years.

  13. upaces88 permalink
    03/10/2013 22:44

    Especially now! ESPECIALLY NOW it would end us forever!

  14. 03/10/2013 22:45

    Duh. That’s the idea.

  15. poetopoet permalink
    03/11/2013 11:27

    The rigged the system, both parties R & D both, too eliminate any 3rd party candidate?

  16. 03/11/2013 12:58

    Perot cost us the Bush 41 reelection. What people WANTED was fiscal responsibility. When 41 raised the taxes after promising he wouldn’t people were disenchanted with him. I guess they don’t hold the MMMPOS to the same standard.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: