It would appear to me
03/10/2013
To be time to arrest these “lawmakers”. Just jack them right the fuck up. There are undoubtedly laws, gather the intel, file the charges, and arrest them. Two of the charges are right there in the tags, subversion and sedition. Then you have the extortion and blackmail charges open.
16 Comments
Comments are closed.
We do have a legal remedy:
18 USC § 2382 – MISPRISION OF TREASON
USC-prelim
US Code
Notes
Currency
This preliminary release may be subject to further revision before it is released again as a final version. As with other online versions of the Code, the U.S. Code Classification Tables should be consulted for the latest laws affecting the Code. Those using the USCPrelim should verify the text against the printed slip laws available from GPO (Government Printing Office), the laws as shown on THOMAS(a legislative service of the Library of Congress), and the final version of the Code when it becomes available.
Current through Pub. L. 112-90. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
It can be filed through two entities:
The Provost Marshall, and read below:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2382
The House and Senate are to be held responsible for NOT stopping him.
upaces88: You are so right. Now with the turncoats who call themselves the GOP, I very much favor a third party, but I have been told they wrote some laws forbidding a third run.
upaces88: Do you of such a law or rule?
Indeed, upaces. Guilty.
I may be misunderstanding you, Poet. IF you are asking me about the “3rd” term?
I, honestly, don’t know if it is a LAW or ???
I have always believed that a sitting President can only serve TWO Terms.
At the moment, yes. The left has been trying to remove the 22nd Amendment for a lot of years.
Found it:
22nd amendment says “…No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of…
Poet HE COULD NOT GET AWAY WITH EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE…..if not with the approval OR passive behavior of those in the House and Senate.
True that.
That’s the one, and that’s why they’re trying to amend it.
If they are trying to amend it now? They already tried that a couple of years ago, and it didn’t pass.
It will be a disaster if they pass it now!
I think it’s actually 20 plus years, they’ve been trying it every few years.
Especially now! ESPECIALLY NOW it would end us forever!
Duh. That’s the idea.
The rigged the system, both parties R & D both, too eliminate any 3rd party candidate?
Perot cost us the Bush 41 reelection. What people WANTED was fiscal responsibility. When 41 raised the taxes after promising he wouldn’t people were disenchanted with him. I guess they don’t hold the MMMPOS to the same standard.