Cmblake6's Weblog

Act of Valor

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:34:18 +0000

This movie is going to be stone incredible! And the reason they chose the people who star is because there’s not going to be the Hollywood interpretation, this is starring many real SEALS who wanted to show the reality.

A couple of the tags? Gentlemen, remember your OATH.

I love this woman a LOT!

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:33:08 +0000

From her blog. You can’t comment over there, she kills the ratings and comments at her You Tube, she speaks what she means and doesn’t give a FUCK what anybody else says. You’ve got to respect someone that can say what they mean, be correct in it, and stand unswayed. I think her theory is “Don’t like? Don’t look.”

I did find a little spot over on the side where she does do twitter. I don’t, so I can’t make the comments I’d like to.

Friday Night Document Dump Shows Holder Knew About Fast and Furious Connection to Brian Terry Murder Day After Border Agent Died

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:50:52 +0000

Reblogged from Nice Deb:

That’s it, he’s toast. He lied under oath, and Congressional Republicans can prove it, now. A series of emails from the latest DOJ Friday night document drop shows that Holder was informed of the Dec15, 2010 shooting of border patrol agent, Brian Terry, before he was even dead. And he was informed that the weapons used to kill him were from Operation Fast and Furious on that same day. Read Matthew Boyle’s entire report at The Daily Caller: These new emails are written evidence that Holder was aware of …

Proof Holder knew. Proof. Now to fry the bitch. Unless, of course, there is some form of immunity offered for certain… revelations?

Nice Deb says

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:35:49 +0000

Newt’s approval is coming back in Florida! I guess he took some advice regarding how to deal with the already dis-proven attacks about the ethics stuff, etc. The left attacked with those charges, Newt was found Not Guilty. So what does Mittens do? Starts kicking a dead dog to try to wake it up. And somebody must have figured that out and started spreading the word that it was bullshit.

Now we just have to use Alinsky against the Alinskyites, just like, it would appear, they’re trying to do amongst our own party members.

Good news, bad news

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:13:08 +0000

From Sher Zieve over at CFP, comes a couple of things. First is one I’ve spoken of already:

The evidence presented was strong and there appears to be, at least, a 50-50 chance of Judge Malihi and the State of Georgia ruling in plaintiffs’ favor. Judge Malihi will file a report, including his recommendations, with the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp. When a decision is given by Judge Malihi, this will be the first time that any ruling on the merits of Obama’s eligibility will have been rendered. Note: After yesterday’s hearing there was some indication that Judge Malihi was planning to rule for the plaintiffs. But, I have been unable to confirm the report.

Then comes the negative stuff:

Now the extremely bad news for US citizens. First, on 19 January 2012, multiple videos were made of a shipment—via rail—of hundreds of Bradley armored vehicles and related equipment moving from Northern California Southward. Then, a few days later, the US military, DHS and local LAPD leaders advised of military drills on the streets of Los Angeles. Note: Said streets, we are advised, will remain secret and no one will be allowed in or out while the ’drills’ are going on. If that’s true and civilians are cordoned off and allowed neither entry nor exit, Martial Law will already be in place.

I don’t know about y’all, but that rather chaps my chops. The only way this could be good is if it turns out to be DHS purging illegals, and we can presume the likelihood of that fairly easily. Coming time pretty quick, methinks. So, it would seem, does Sher:

One thing is now very clear. Obama, his DHS, the US Military and local law enforcement (who by the way would NOT be deployed to foreign soil) appear to be working to take down US citizens in fairly short order. Soon they will come for any and all of our weapons. Hitler did it in Germany under the pretense of “It will help us protect you” in the 1930s. After that came the (at least) six-million Jews’ Holocaust. Although I have heard many times that US citizens won’t allow it, I have strong doubts. US citizens are already allowing their small children and the elderly to be sexually groped and prodded by perverse TSA employees—their own CHILDREN, folks!

Will you be courageous enough to fight against the tyranny that has, already, almost totally encompassed us? Or, will you submit to the imposition of your complete slavery? The decision shortly will be forced upon us all.

A Senator grew some balls!

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:08:28 +0000

And the Keystone Pipeline may not be dead after all!

H.R. 3548, submitted by Lee Terry, R-Neb., would take the decision out of Obama’s hands and order the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, to issue a permit within 30 days.

Some say the decision never belonged to the president anyway.

This was right up at the top, this is nearer the middle:

Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., also spoke at the Jan. 25 hearing and explained that the deadlines both Jones and President Obama referenced were anything but “arbitrary.”

“Last July, the House passed a bill requiring the State Department to make its long-overdue decision on Keystone XL by Nov. 1. It was truly a bipartisan effort, with 47 Democrats joining nearly all Republicans in supporting this reasonable measure,” he said. “The bill probably would have garnered even more votes if not for the administration’s repeated assurances that it is going to make a decision before the end of 2011, and that a legislated deadline is not necessary.

“Unfortunately, as the end of the year approached, the administration reversed position and postponed its decision to 2013 at the earliest.

“In response, Congress gave the president a second chance to do the right thing by providing him another 60 days to approve Keystone XL as part of the payroll tax bill, but last week he decided to reject the project.”

I’m going along with something I read in another post of less interest, but the wording of a comment was to the effect that BHO the SCOAMF was not stupid, but was intentionally trying to make America a third world country. Well, we know that from it’s own statement about doing things by EO if Congress failed to do as it told them.

What was that about separation of authorities? It was on that stupid piece of paper written way back. the, uhm,… Constitution! Yeah, that was it, Constitution!

This is nearer the bottom:

Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., also spoke at the hearing, noting, “The phrase ‘national interest’ should be somewhat simple to understand.”

“If the nation is plagued by persistent unemployment and a private company is willing to spend $7 billion to construct an infrastructure project, putting over 100,000 people to work – that sounds like something that serves the national interest,” he said. “If our president decides that sending aircraft carrier strike groups to the Strait of Hormuz to defend oil flow is in the national interest, then one would also think a pipeline from Canada that would help eliminate our Middle East oil imports also serves the national interest.”

There was much more to that entire article, MUCH more. Those were some pretty fair teasers though, and I guess I should have said Some, not A on that ball growing part. And thrown in the Representatives on that. Whatever the entirety of it, this might be a show of American interest coming to the fore amongst the people!

Now we must pray that enough OF the Senate stands in support of the House. Perhaps my title was a bit off, but it sounded better somehow.

From “The Blaze”

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:44:12 +0000

Sarah Palin speaks of the Alinsky tactics being used by the establishment rethuglicans against the TEA Party Republicans. It is a VERY good short sharp shot against the sellouts.

Ultimately, Palin said, the clash isn’t between Gingrich and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney: It’s a fight between the Republican establishment and Tea Party and independent Americans who are “sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives.”

“Now, I respect Governor Romney and his success,” Palin said. “But there are serious concerns about his record and whether as a politician he consistently applied conservative principles and how this impacts the agenda moving forward. The questions need answers now. That is why this primary should not be rushed to an end. We need to vet this.”

Palin also went on to question whether the GOP establishment would use the same tactics they’re employing against Gingrich against Obama in the general election.

“They’re now using every available microscope and endoscope – along with rewriting history – in attempts to character assassinate anyone challenging their chosen one in their own party’s primary,” Palin said. “So, one must ask, who are they really running against?”

Mitt Romney V The Constitution (Part 2)

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:08:07 +0000

Reblogged from Contagious Transformation:

By Tiffany Harbridge We will begin our fact finding mission way back in 1994 with this gem: Campaigning for the Senate in 1994, Romney said he favored strong gun laws and did not “line up with the NRA.” Romney backed the Brady Bill which among other items attaches a five day waiting period to purchase a gun. The candidate reiterated his support for an assault weapons ban contained in Congress’ crime bill, and the Brady law which imposes a five-day waiting period on handgun purchases. “I don’t …

A little more of that sweet tender meat to give you a heads up on this scenario.

Mitt Romney V the Constitution, PT I

cmblake6 — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:06:29 +0000

Reblogged from Contagious Transformation:

By Tiffany Harbridge This is the first in series of articles discussing Mr. Romney’s Constitutional crisis. I had promised an article that would concentrate on Romneycare and the devastation that has been wrought in the state of Massachusetts as a result of Romneycare being instituted here in my home state. However, delving into the record of this man who managed my state for a few short years, I found that we cannot even begin to scratch the surface of the story without finding multiple layers that …

While ABO ’12 may be our primary call to freedom, AND while Romneyavitch has a good point or two (especially in the understanding of Venture Capitalism), we all know that there’s not a whole LOT of difference betwenn him and BHO but the sun tan. Luap Nor ain’t happening, so Newt would seem to be it.

Been too long

cmblake6 — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:48:37 +0000

Since I put up a “Wild Bill”. Jackboot put this one up at the Rott.