How is “climate change” a threat to our National Security. Cutting our military, limiting our training, cutting our equipment levels, all this shit makes us weak. Check history, check every major war we’ve ever had. Our military had been allowed to dwindle, and when we got weak enough, somebody started the shit. So, all this money we save on supporting the military, so we can spend it on “climate change”, is purely for the sake of us getting our asses kicked in the next one. Yes, we are Americans. We have always risen to meet the foe, and won. In the past, before all this metrosexual programming bullshit of the last 50 years or so.
Because of the schmucks who profess (whether they actually do, or not) to believe in this politically correct bullshit. Climate change is a historical fact. Check the rings of an ancient tree, for example. It happens every so often, and in a fairly regular cycle. It happens every year, it’s called “the seasons”.
This planet does not have a perfectly regular orbit. The recent variations in temperatures have been proven to have been rigged by putting thermometers on top of buildings with tar roofs, by putting thermometers on runways at airports, so a political agenda could be instituted. El Nino and all that crap happen in regular cycles, and ice ages and warm ages have been proven through ice cores and tree rings due to the irregular orbit.
This is all bullshit to extort the general public, and supported by those who would be of the ruling class.
This is not what the USA was founded on, nor how it was intended by the Founders to be.
Read the Federalist papers, read the writings of the Founders to one another and see that they foresaw this insanity. They wrote that there needed to be frequent corrections to the direction that they KNEW the nation would drift.
Here are a number of good quotes, there are many more if you dig a bit. Okay, that is a parallel to the principle theme here, or is it? Is it not, in its own way, a perfect tie in?
It all boils down to a government that would rule rather than serve. Using coercion instead of force to achieve the same goal. Be it our climate consciousness, or our desire for security, it is all the same.
In what way is “climate change” the primary threat to National Security?
I’ll give you my thoughts on that tonight, but my answer is quite simple.
Depends on the size of your hands, the bulk of your body, and the fill of your wallet.
I’ve read a lot of tests, I’ve watched a lot of videos, and I’ve watched people fall down perforated by numerous calibers in my time. I knew the 380 was enough. I, however, am a believer that there is no such thing as overkill. 380 will work just fine, and in a small package. What’s not to like?
I’m partial to the 45 for my visible carry on my belt in plain sight. I’ll take my 45 hog hunting, hell it went through both shoulders! But if you don’t see me with a gun it’s probably because my 380 hides well inside my belt. An untucked t-shirt covers it, no print. I know I’ve got enough to stop the argument sufficiently. More is better, maybe, but enough will do.
What’s it going to take to repel the invaders?
This is a very solid consideration. I relatively sure that any of my readers have a little sumpin’ sumpin’ handy, but you may want to spread this to others you know who don’t:
There are a large number of them available at quite reasonable prices, and the reasonable prices thing doesn’t even have to be in quotes. Then again, what is your life worth? You can spend anywhere from around $100 to over $1,000, and those less expensive ones will do the job. Up to you how much you want to invest for this little piece of insurance. And insurance is what it is. If you never have to use it, it wasn’t that much to buy, and if you ever do have to use it you will be extremely glad you have it.