Upaces88 sent me a Devvy Kidd article on this subject. And it is pretty blunt and to the point.
And the link within the link is exactly so. I love it when there has already been legal opinion stated:
States must fight legal fiction called ‘anchor babies’, October 3, 2011
“Consider these words from Edward J. Erler, Professor of Political Science, California State University, San Bernardino, in his column (I hope you take the time to read all of it):
Birthright Citizenship and Dual Citizenship: Harbingers of Administrative Tyranny
“In sum, this legacy of feudalism—which we today call birthright citizenship—was decisively rejected as the ground of American citizenship by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Expatriation Act of 1868. It is absurd, then, to believe that the Fourteenth Amendment confers the boon of American citizenship on the children of illegal aliens. Nor does the denial of birthright citizenship visit the sins of the parents on the children, as is often claimed, since the children of illegal aliens born in the U.S. are not being denied anything to which they have a right. Their allegiance should follow that of their parents during their minority. Furthermore, it is difficult to fathom how those who defy American law can derive benefits for their children by their defiance—or that any sovereign nation would allow such a thing.”
“He further points out: “But in any case, to say that children of legal aliens are entitled to citizenship is one thing; after all, their parents are in the country with the permission of the U.S. It is entirely different with illegal aliens, who are here without permission. Thus repeal of the current policy of birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens would not require a constitutional amendment.”
“Prof. Erler hit it out of the ball park: Children born on US soil of an illegal alien parent (or two parents) regardless of country of origin have no “right” to U.S. citizenship.”
There was more before in this article, and plenty more after. Both from Ms Kidd and in the link-within-the-link article I just quoted. If you had any questions, these contain enough to get you well on the way to all your answers.
This question has been answered already. Why is it still being asked?
Oh, right, we have an illegal alien in place as POTUS.
This man makes sense as AG!
Sheriff David Clarke ROCKS!
But one of the most baffling things about ILLEGAL immigration is the reasons.
And the value of The Donald.
PJMedia has an extremely good article that explained a big piece of my thought probably better than I could have said it myself.
Fine, fine, one more:
Either to end the night, or start the day, here you go. GOTTA LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!