Skip to content

Now that that is out of the way,


A little bit of serious stuff before bed.

Last night was heavy into CFP. Heavy enough, in fact, to be another link/clip compilation.

Judi had a hella post about why identity theft is so rampant.

The biggest sea change that came in with Barack Obama is one never mentioned.  The biggest change is the one that opened the floodgates for 21st Century crime. In an era where identity theft thrives, Obama’s 2008 capture of the White House unofficially ‘legitimized’ the Fine Art of Assumed Identity.

For lack of documentation it has never been proven otherwise that the President of the United States of America operates under an assumed identity, and if the President of the United States of America can operate under an assumed identity, then why can’t petty thieves, rapists and murderers operate with the same privilege?

Dr. Paugh writes an article regarding Tennessee, the UN Agenda 21, and the 10th Amendment. And not just Tennessee, but a number of other states are listed in this article.

Lawmakers in Tennessee passed a resolution on March 15, 2012 condemning United Nations Agenda 21 as a “destructive and insidious” environmental plan to advance communist agenda under the guise of community planning.

The state House of Representatives voted 72-23 in favor of House Joint Resolution 587, which denounces the non-binding UN Agenda 21 plan adopted by the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

United Nations claims that sustainable development principles alleviate poverty and combat global warming. Resolution 587 describes sustainable development as a plan for “socialist/communist redistribution of wealth” through energy conservation policies, zoning restrictions, and forced abortions.

“It reads well. It has nice words like sustainability and helping the poor,” said state Rep. Glen Casada, R-Franklin. “But what these people want to do is they want to cap the number of people this planet can have. … So ladies and gentlemen, if that doesn’t bother you, if those words don’t scare you, we’ve got to talk.” (The Tennessean)

Oh, fear not. There is a LOT more to that article!

This one from Dr. Don Boys asks a slightly different question. And a comment I put up earlier states the obvious answer.

Obama must be questioned thoroughly by everyone especially reporters because four more years of his misrule will be catastrophic. A president always waits until his second term to take off his mask and reveal himself. So, some urgent questions are required and no pabulum will be swallowed.

That was not the question, but it leads to the the questionS. And I’m sure you can guess my response to said article.

And finally (for now), you’ll remember how we’ve mentioned the whole false flag, martial law, freeze the elections, etcetra theory? Just wait until you read THIS one!

This Executive Order was posted on the WhiteHouse.govweb site on Friday, March 16, 2012, under the name National Defense Resources Preparedness.  In a nutshell, it’s the blueprint for Peacetime Martial Law and it gives the president the power to take just about anything deemed necessary for “National Defense”, whatever they decide that is.  It’s peacetime, because as the title of the order says, it’s for “Preparedness”.  A copy of the entire order follows the end of this story.

Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions; Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes),  and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available.  This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they turn this one on.

Yep, yep, getting it all set up. The party may need to happen anyway. Now it’s just a waiting game.

Anyway, enjoy those articles, feel free to dissect them and discuss them.

  1. FX Phillips permalink
    03/18/2012 07:42

    Regarding Obama’s latest power grab.

    This is just a set up for the final “putsch”.

    He has no legal authority to do this just like he has no legal authority to mandate the religious violate their conscience or enact laws like cap and trade or the dream act that didn’t pass congressional muster.

    He has flaunted the law and made it clear that the law does not apply to him. Meanwhile the gutless republican frontrunner soft sells Obama’s malignancy and mendacity and the elected republicans quail in fear of being called names as this man lies and bullies his way to establishing his scocio/fascist wet dream.

    At least the enabling acts of Hitler had the tacit approval of congress this is just outright usurpation.

    It is lawless.

    It is immoral.

    It is grotesque.

  2. 03/18/2012 14:34

    THAT is the fact.

  3. Dr. Jeff permalink
    03/18/2012 19:16

    yeah, I just found the piece through Drudge and emailed the direct link to the original White House document to a lot of people. Even a quick scan of the document shows a framework for slave labor.

    I don’t want to know what comes next. November is going to be important.

    Before he was elected I was worried about how much permanent damage Obama was going to do. He’s been successful beyond my worst nightmare. What scares me even more is what will the next President do with it? Will he trash the thing wholesale or will he allow it to quietly stand. Or will he “enhance” parts of it?

  4. 03/18/2012 19:20

    Check ammo, hope it was not necessary.

  5. 03/18/2012 19:41

    Okay, I’ll leap. Did a bit o research, and looked at a blog (AoS) which is pushing for “calmer heads”. And though I can agree with knocking the panic mode down a notch, I think he misses the point any number of commenters are making. So here we go.

    1. This is a re-hash of an existing Executive Order, which in turn is a rehash of an EO which came out in 1950 , and is, itself, an update of one issued in 1939..

    2. The EO in ’39 was a formalized description of how the Executive office (branch) breaks down, and what duties/powers all the players have. The EO in ’50 is much more geared toward not only the existing threat of Communism, but “nuclear holocaust” as well. The current one goes a bit further, in that it (by it’s very vagueness) it allows for a pretty big latitude in when the President is allowed to invoke this EO. (And to a bit lesser extent, what he and his players are allowed to do, that they could not have before.)

    3. Though I can buy into this being a “rehash” or an “update” of previous EOs of like nature, what I cannot buy into is assuming the current occupant of the oval office is not going to use this, at the first available opportunity. Will it be right after the election (as suggested above) or will the middle east get “hot” (as in the Straits of Hormuz being “shut down”) or “really hot” (as in Israel has had enough and decides to make parts of Iran into glass)…or just a case of the Wookie’s knickers getting knotted up for some reason or another. Your guess is as good as mine. But mark my words, he will find an excuse.

  6. 03/18/2012 20:00

    My main input to this is “But this is Obama”.

  7. 03/18/2012 20:13

    And I agree with you my friend. This is Obama. Will he do it right after the next national election, before tee next President attempts to assume office? Or will there be some other “emergency” between now and then, which requires him “to act”? The founding fathers would have been dismayed at the one for ’39, furious at the one from ’50, and (hopefully) rising out of their collective graves, because of the current one. Far too much power invested in the Executive Branch. And folks thought Nixon was a big time abuser of power (Hey, what about FDR and LBJ for crying out loud!) ….but Nixon is a piker compared to the current putz.

  8. Dr. Jeff permalink
    03/18/2012 21:48

    No kidding about Nixon. Watergate was a wet firecracker next to what’s coming for Obama. Now all we need is for someone to pay attention to Sheriff Arpaio.

  9. Dr. Jeff permalink
    03/18/2012 21:50

    Have ammo, reloading equipment is on order from Dillon.

  10. upaces88 permalink
    03/19/2012 00:28

    FX…he hasn’t had the legal authority to do a great deal of what he has done — yet, no one has stopped him yet.
    And, yes, it is everything you said…but he will continue.

    You WILL NOT Like this…Yes, it is illegal. Yes, it is against the Constitution and everything we believe in…but he is doing it anyway…and NO ONE is stopping him….yet, anyway. I do expect the Military to step in.

    New Executive Order-He is TAKING OVER

  11. 03/19/2012 05:38

    We are sworn to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. However, when you have such as MajGen Dempsey, sucking up to such as Panetta and the UN/NATO, unless that is just setting up the coup, we are IN THE SHIT BIG TIME!

  12. 03/19/2012 05:43

    Guy, the Gay Chupacabra has performed ONE (1) decent act. It has taken the historical burden of worst pResident in American history off the back of Jimmuh.

  13. 03/19/2012 05:48

    Sheesh, talk about damning with faint praise!

  14. 03/19/2012 06:05

    Love ya, man. Check ammo.

  15. FX Phillips permalink
    03/19/2012 06:50

    First thank you Guy S. for providing that information.

    I owe der Fuehermeister half an apology. This order is pursuant to an actual law Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.)

    The most disturbing part has been identified as this.

    (b)(1) The President is further authorized, to the extent he deems it necessary and
    appropriate in order to carry out the provisions of this Act [50 U.S.C. App. § 2061-2171] [50
    U.S.C. App. § 2061-2710], and subject to such regulations as he may issue, to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation

    This actually appears in the law as amended on page 36 of the text. Whether it is in the original or it got there by subsequent amendment is not specified.

    The whole EO is a reiteration pursuant to an act of congress so we basically have the ninnies in congress who have handed the weapon of our enslavement to this unlawful putz.


    FX…he hasn’t had the legal authority to do a great deal of what he has done — yet, no one has stopped him yet

    I’m well aware of his lawlessness.It’s one of my favorite hobby horses. I just can’t list every violation and usurpation as that would possibly take up all of CM’s bandwidth not to mention make me expire at my keyboard due to apoplexy.

    I’m in the process of listening to the audio you provided. 2 hours is an awful long time to hold my attention unfortunately. ;-).

    I see CM has made this a discrete post while I wrote this comment. I will post any my impressions there..

  16. 03/19/2012 06:56

    Excellent. I revel in your posts, and I certainly do NOT worry about how much space you use! These inputs from you folks fill in the blanks I may have, and completely support the original thesis. PARTY ON!

  17. FX Phillips permalink
    03/19/2012 07:00

    PS- Just because I lay some of the blame at the feet of an increasingly feckless congress does not mean I condone any of this. Congress had no real authority to assert these powers either or the authority to delegate such powers.

  18. 03/19/2012 07:56

    As I remember, Congress does have the power to revoke actions taken under EO.

  19. FX Phillips permalink
    03/19/2012 10:20

    PSS Truman used this law as justification for trying and seize the steel mills in 1952. Part of the problem was exacerbated by Truman’s wage and price boards(established ostensibly under the emergency provisions of the 1950 act via EO10161 9/9/50) working at cross purposes granting labor a wage increase but not allowing industry to recoup the cost. When industry balked Truman went about seizing the steel industry. A seizure which was subsequently reversed in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, et. al. v Sawyer.

  20. 03/19/2012 10:22

    I ran really fast (LOL) to get over here to put in this comment:

    Keep in mind, please, that the original was FOR FEMA during earthquakes, massive flooding. It was made to protect people from having their stores and homes looted. He took that language out in order for him to, basically, be able to do anything he wants.

    He removed the language from Clinton In Order 12919 from the orders going

    way back, that Obama reinstated by revoking 12919. Executive order 12919 is almost exactly the

    same as Obamas , it would seem that Darla was right in her analysis from the beginning . As near as I can tell Obamas EO removes quite a few references to powers that belonged to FEMA and assigned them to the department of homeland security . At the time of EO 12919 Department of Homeland Security didn’t exist .. Because the two were mostly identical now. except for those changes ,12919 was revoked . Please someone check me on these facts , being wrong could be disastrous.

  21. 03/19/2012 10:43

    FX,with what he is doing now…he is King and the House and Senate work FOR him.

  22. 03/19/2012 17:22

    No, they do/did not have such authority. This is a return to monarchy, Constitution be damned. The Japanese internment of WWII should have been actively fought, but it was played as a security measure so that the public would accept it. Oh yeah, this is a long term plan.

  23. upaces88 permalink
    03/19/2012 19:01

    He WILL Suspend the elections — hide and watch.

  24. Dr. Jeff permalink
    03/19/2012 20:03

    I’m just hoping that Sheriff Arpaio and the rest of the investigators tracking Obama come up with a pile of evidence so damning that not even the MSM can ignore it. There’s plenty of precedent (the example with the Japanese internment camps is a good one) for law enforcement officials to violate the law while believing they are enforcing the law. Until something pushes them in the right direction, that will be a major problem. A lot of officers don’t think, they just follow orders. They can be very good Germans.

    Oathkeepers needs to push harder on their recruiting drive, especially within the DoJ and the Secret Service. I’d just love to see Holder arrested by the FBI and Obama arrested by the Secret Service.

  25. upaces88 permalink
    03/19/2012 23:53

    Guy, and CM….
    Yes, I did read what you said..way up there above me; however, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OBAMA here. IF there is a “hint” of something — it is much much worse!

    Tiny, tiny example: TSA…all in the name of National Security that he twists, distorts, and prostitutes it as an opportunity to “have control” over the human beings — citizens, mothers, fathers, their babies to fondle them….WITHOUT ever feeling up a Muslim….

    He is doing everything he can possibly do to prostitute, adulterate (context: USE, abuse) our society as a whole on every possible level. AND, he will continue to do so.

    Let go of the thoughts, He can’t do that…it is in Constitution; or he wouldn’t take it that far because… we are a sovereign nation. HE IS AND WILL CONTINUE to work on destroying our Nation as well as anything else he can do to demoralize and destroy our Faith in Our Country and Our God. He even tried to demoralize us as well as the Military the way he apologized to the world FOR our men who ended up being innocent…AFTER and only after 4 of them were murdered.
    Did he apologize to he families of those men he was “indirectly” the cause of their deaths? No!

    His psychological warfare is against the American People as he raises the Muslims to a newer height.
    DO NOT make he mistake or allow anyone to make the mistake of under estimating the bastard.

  26. 03/20/2012 07:07

    Beautifully said, U.

    And exactly right, Dr. Jeff.

  27. 03/21/2012 01:27

    @ Dr. Jeff:
    I wanted to bonk the Sheriff and Jan Brewer on the head (wake up call) — when Obama was in Arizona. HE WAS ON THEIR TURF…gosh, I wish that had thought ahead and had a Warrant for his Arrest right then and there…however, I know what you’re gonna say…
    (sigh) — all the evidence was not in yet. (darn’t).

  28. 03/21/2012 07:54

    I’m forced to say the same. BUT we have it now!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: