Skip to content

I’m told that the reason Ovomit won this time


Aside from the rigged machines and districts mentioned in posts before, is that too many conservatives sat home rather than vote for Romney. Now, in some ways, I see their logic. As with the other points of this, let the Ds fuck it up so that people see what that means. Problem with that is, are we going to be able to recover from how badly they fuck it up? Yes, I realize that Ronaldus Magnus saved us from how fucked up Peanut made us. Will we get another him to save us from Ovomits fucking up? With all the goat spooge it spews, and all the financial destruction it performs, WHAT KIND OF STRUGGLE ARE WE GOING TO FACE? If nothing else:


Look at what we’re having to face now. Would Romney have been any better? Could he have been any worse? And what about the Congressional numbers? If you “protesting conservatives” hadn’t sat your ass at home, would we have had a better government than we do now? Probably. The election of 2014 is a LONG way off. Will we last until then? Or will the government get more screwed and the Constitution get destroyed by Congressional action?

  1. poetopoet permalink
    01/23/2013 07:21

    Yes they will! “Or will the government get more screwed and the Constitution get destroyed by Congressional action?”

  2. upaces88 permalink
    01/23/2013 08:31

    There were several of us who watched this VERY closely from its beginning. Not too many people are aware of “when it REALLY began.”
    In the beginning, remember, there were several really good people with a great deal of knowledge under their belts! right?

    This IS a step by step as we remember it. It DOES NOT MATTER if you were for OR against Newt Gingrich and Michelle Bachman, okay? What we need to be mindful of is what was going on behind the scenes. Remember this one thing throughout anything I say below. Newt Gingrich and Michelle Bachman WERE THE ONLY CANDIDATES running who wanted to expose the Muslims in Our Federal Govt.; expose them; and remove them. Plus they were the ONLY ones who wanted to BAN SHARIA LAW in this country for once and for all.

    Several of us were on Newt Gingrich’s site. We were KICKED OFF….Banned! We finally found out the reason. Seems a Romney bunch decided that “Newt would have wanted this” (huh? Yes!). They had “decided” that it would be a Romney/Santorum ticket (huh?!!!)

    Remember the Florida screw up? Just prior to that, there was another massive fraud that happened. Seems there was a law suit filed by Ron Paul (and no, I am not a Ron Paul fan; however, the man stepped forward to try to stop the fraud). People were threatened and coerced into voting for Romney as the candidate. AFTER the law suit, now all of those votes were once again FREE to be caste freely for those who wanted to vote for someone else!

    Well Romney was declared the candidate ONLY AFTER A NEW LAW (OR RULE) WAS IMPLEMENTED. Now this is VERY important. And, connects to why Obama mentioned running for a “3rd Term”. The NEW RNC Rule is that THEY WILL DECIDE WHO CAN AND WHO CANNOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT. In other words, let’s say YOU want to run for President. Guess what! UNLESS THEY APPROVE OF YOU….no matter how much $$ you have or strong background, YOU CANNOT RUN unless THEY DECIDE.

    Do you understand the implications of this? This is the FIRST STEP in setting up a NWO format. Citizens are no longer allowed to vote…THEY DO IT ALL! Now the door is totally OPEN for ROMNEY TO WIN!

    Romney had been waiting in the wings. AGAIN, we were kicked off….”banned” from sites warning people about Romney. We wanted them to fight back and get a candidate THAT WAS FOR US NOT THE NWO. We uploaded his past…all proof that he would waiver and give in during the most crucial moments. Remember the several times they found fraud where Romney was concerned during the campaign? NOT ONE THING WAS DONE.

    Then along comes the Florida Caucus….remember now…all of the votes have been turned loose for them to vote their conscience vs. BEING TOLD WHO TO VOTE FOR.

    Suddenly, they are all afraid of a “possible” storm front coming in…huh? They want,, for the first time in history, a CALL IN VOTE vs. being there in person! The next day, they were afraid of the OWS (you know, those kids with the high $ cell phones living in mom’s basement interfering.

    The word got out that the law suit had been successful and that now everyone was free to vote their conscience…right? Michelle Bachman, Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin decided they would be there to capture the “soft votes” now released giving Bachman and/or Gingrich another opportunity to come back.

    At that specific time of voting, Cars were blocked of those people who WANTED to vote for anyone other than Romney.

    Well, you know the rest….Obama, again, in by massive fraud; and Romney ran off and hid.

    At this point, Our Country Has been Hijacked by Barrack Hussein Obama.
    Now he wants a “3rd Term.”

  3. poetopoet permalink
    01/23/2013 09:47

    upaces88, Hi really don’t follow it, but I think I do, because of the outcome.

  4. poetopoet permalink
    01/23/2013 11:32

    USA Today is the most liberal mag out there or among them.

  5. poetopoet permalink
    01/23/2013 11:43

    NEW YORK – If lawmakers and authorities are truly concerned about stopping gun violence in schools, they need to take a close look at the prescription of psychotropic drugs for children and young people, says a leading psychiatrist.
    In an exclusive in-person interview in New York City with WND, London-based Dr. David Healy criticized pharmaceutical companies that have made billions of dollars marketing Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, known as SSRIs.
    Psychotropic drugs “prescribed for school children cause violent behavior,” Healy stated.
    The drugs are widely used in the U.S. as antidepressants by doctors working in the mental health field and increasingly by primary care doctors, he noted.
    Healey insisted the problem today is that doctors working with schools to control the behavior of children are inclined to prescribe SSRI drugs without serious consideration of adverse consequences.
    “The pharmaceutical companies made these drugs with the idea of making money,” he said. “There’s a wide range of problems when it comes to looking at these drugs for children. Very few children have serious problems that warrant treatment with pills that have the risks SSRI drugs have.”
    The drugs can make children “aggressive and hostile,” he noted.
    “Children taking SSRI drugs are more likely to harm or to injure other children at school,” said Healy. “The child may be made suicidal.
    “We are giving drugs to children who are passing through critical development stages, and as a society we are really conducting a vast experiment and no one really knows what the outcome of that will be.”
    Healey cautioned that there is a very high correlation between mass shootings and use of the drugs.
    “When roughly nine out of every 10 cases in these school shootings and mass shootings involve these drugs being prescribed, then at least a significant proportion of these cases were either caused by the drugs or the drugs made a significant contribution to the problem,” he said.
    President Obama, in a series of 23 presidential memoranda and proclamations signed last week, called for the Centers for Disease control to undertake research to examine gun violence and to explore medical means to control the problem.
    WND contended that putting more mental illness screening into schools would actually increase the incidence of school shootings, not reduce the violence.
    “You can draw a line between the number of child psychiatrists in the United States and the number of school shootings, and you will find that both have gone up in the same direction at the same time,” he said.
    He sees a “propaganda campaign” being conducted in the U.S. in the wake of the Aurora, Colo., cinema shooting and the Newtown, Conn., school shooting asserting gun violence is being caused by mental illness and could be stopped by additional school programs that screen for it.
    “If school children are screened for mental illness problems, this presumably will lead more medical doctors to put more students on more pills,” he said. “I would predict then the outcome of more school screenings for mental illness will be more mass killings, even if the guns are taken away and the mass killings are not done with guns.”
    He cautioned shareholders of pharmaceutical companies to realize share prices can be adversely affected should judges and juries determine the companies bear legal liabilities. Law enforcement investigators could conclude one of the company’s medications was prescribed to a child who ended up perpetrating a school shooting.
    Healy cautioned that medical doctors who prescribe pills do not necessarily cure mental illness problems.
    He argued that today medical doctors are inclined to solve a wide range of health problems by prescribing drugs. In previous generations, however, extended families were capable of providing a context of family history to understand behavioral problems and to identify a wide range of problem-solving treatments. The families understood the issue as a developmental problem better treated by family intervention than by medicine.
    “Market research, for instance, has made pharmaceutical companies realize it is much harder to sell drugs for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD, in a home or a community where the child’s grandmother is likely to be present,” he explained. “Because, of course, the grandmother may say, ‘That kid doesn’t need pills. His father was just like him, and look, his father turned out alright.’ Medicine intervenes with pills when communities have lost their roots in families.”
    Healy also expressed distress that information available to pharmaceutical companies exposing adverse side effects of SSRI medications is not made available to the public.
    To solve this problem, Healy has created a website,, that allows the posting of personal experiences with SSRI drugs by people who have had personal experience or have had partners, parents, children or friends injured by them. These are people, the website says, “who have found themselves trapped in a Kafkaesque world when they have sought help from doctors, regulators, or others who seem to be there to help us”
    The goal of is to create a database open to the public that provides a report a patient can take to a doctor or pharmacist to support and inform a conversation about the adverse sides of a particular SSRI drug.
    Independently, a sortable database of 4,800 cases in which SSRI drugs have been associated with violent behavior in the U.S. and worldwide has been posted on the Internet, compiled from incidents that have appeared in the media, scientific journals and Federal Drug Administration testimony.
    SSRI drugs covered in the sortable database include Prozac (fluoxetine), Zoloft (sertraline), Paxil (paroxetine), Celexa (citalopram), Lexapro (escitalopram) and Luvox (fluvoxamine)

  6. 01/23/2013 12:31

    Yeah, and you saw the response.

  7. upaces88 permalink
    01/23/2013 15:21

    It would not have mattered if Romney won or anyone else for that matter.


  8. 01/23/2013 21:13

    It would have been physically removed then.

  9. upaces88 permalink
    01/25/2013 17:49

    So? Why hasn’t it been removed?

  10. 01/25/2013 17:57

    Have you heard the news? It has been found guilty of Constitutional Violation by one of the higher courts. All over Fox News.

  11. upaces88 permalink
    01/26/2013 19:48

    I missed that!!!!!
    So? What do you think will happen?

  12. 01/26/2013 23:34

    We’ll just have to put them out of our misery.

  13. upaces88 permalink
    01/27/2013 14:36

    Have you heard anything more about it today? I haven’t…that’s why I am asking you.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: