Would you like a few details about our new CIA director?
You may already know some of these, hell, you may even know more.You may have read this article which condenses stuff I’ve read dribs and drabs of about the sphere. But I did find this interesting:
Now, this to me is the most interesting thing about the article. This is what made me want to find the reasoning for that title. What do you think that reason might be, eh?
Another angle on why Brennan might not have wanted to swear his oath on the Bible relates to a shocking report by one of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam, who says Brennan actually converted to Islam years ago while living in Saudi Arabia.
As WND reported, former FBI Islam expert John Guandolo has long warned that the federal government is being infiltrated by members of the radical Muslim Brotherhood. But Guandolo now warns that by appointing Brennan to CIA director, Obama has not only chosen a man “naïve” to these infiltrations, but also picked a candidate who is himself a Muslim.
“Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia,” Guandolo told interviewer and radio host Tom Trento.
Okay then. Why should that matter? :roll: Stupid question.
“That fact alone is not what is most disturbing,” Guandolo continued. “His conversion to Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him. The fact that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either [is] a traitor … [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of environments, which makes him completely unfit to the be the director of Central Intelligence.”
What more do you need to know about what’s going on in DC, and most particularly the resident of the WH? How about this, let’s go back UP the page a little. I’m not laying this out the same as the article, because I think the points aren’t necessarily in the correct order for consideration. What did he swear in on?
“Brennan was sworn in with his hand on an original draft of the Constitution, dating from 1787, which has George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it.”
Oooo! Sounds impressive, eh? But wait, what was the date on that? Original draft. Okay, what got added in before OFFICIAL adoption in, what was it now, 1791?
“When Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments – or any of the other amendments now included in our Constitution,” the report said. “The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, four years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on.”
Wrote the blogger, “These vows always carry a great deal of symbolism. And whether he meant to invoke this symbolism or not, the moment at which Brennan took over the CIA happened to exclude (in symbolic form, though presumably not legally) the key limits on governmental power that protect American citizens.”
But, surely there could be no symbolism to that, could there? Yoo fockin’ betcha. I’ll close this with something from a bit farther down the page than where I started:
“My contention is that [Brennan] is wholly unfit for government service in any national security capacity, and that would specifically make him unfit to be the director of Central Intelligence,” Guandolo told Trento.
Guandolo then broke down a three-part argument against Brennan’s confirmation.
That, I hope, will be bait sufficient for you to go check that argument. It’s too late now, he’s been sworn in. So he’s there until it gets taken away from him by whatever means. Change of administration, resignation, assassination, whatever.
Question behind all this is, why would our glorious leader possibly want a mudslime in charge of the CIA? Our pre-eminent spook place for keeping America safe from things like, oh, say, other mudslimes? The logic escapes.