Skip to content

You will remember what I have said about the “tax stamp”?


Here is a weapon requiring 2 tax stamps. Why? 2 minor details, the “can” and the full length stock on what started life as a handgun, means an extra $400 to the government and your name in their database. Let me let Hickok45 explain it:

Again, read the 2A. Review the 1934 NFA, or the 1968 GCA. Both are in direct violation of the Constitution.

  1. Richard M Nixon (Deceased) permalink
    01/02/2014 20:11

    Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.

  2. 01/02/2014 20:46

    Reblogged this on BPI reblog and commented:
    You will remember what I have said about the “tax stamp”?

  3. 01/03/2014 00:21

    Oh, btw, there are things that can be done to improve the action and so on in these things. Check for one of the best known, and the best OF, the tune up specialists to be found.

  4. 01/03/2014 17:11

    Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you penning this write-up
    plus the rest of the website is really good.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: