Skip to content

Could someone PLEASE explain to me


How in the FUCK that MGMMPOS is still alive? Or at least not in prison awaiting it’s execution for treason?

Since it was fraudulently (provably if someone would get off their dead ass and present the evidence) installed as the POTUS, unemployment has risen, people have fucking given up looking for work so the apparent figures look better, full time employment has dropped, the number of poor vs rich has widened, taxation is berserk, military pay has been cut again or at least COL raises have not existed, 17,000 troops are about to join the unemployed ranks while the illegals are offered their slots to “earn” their citizenship, name any possible form of destruction to the economy and The Nation and there’s an EO for it.

When I joined the military in 1974, and I swore The OATH, I knew what I was saying, and I said it with the deepest pride you can imagine. When I was 14, I took the MENSA test and passed it. I had studied the Constitution of my own accord, and knew what it meant. I committed 20 years of my life protecting this nation against what got installed after my retirement.

To the best of my knowledge, that OATH has not changed. What seems to HAVE changed is the understanding of the commitment the troops have sworn to obey.

To the best of my knowledge, Congress swears that same OATH, or very close.

To the best of my knowledge, the SS swears that same OATH.

To the best of my knowledge, damn near EVERY public official does as well. Of any form. From Governors, to state Senators and Representatives, to City officials, to cops, to the fucking dog catcher.

The first, and most important, part is to support and defend The Constitution against ALL enemies foreign and domestic. All the miscellaneous waffle about following the orders of those appointed above me is only true IF they are NOT enemies of The Constitution. If they ARE, it is your duty to remove them.

The penalty for treason is death.Almost every member of damn near any office has committed this.


  1. YouKnowWho permalink
    09/05/2015 07:55

    Unless I am misremembering the Oath, it is not, “…to follow the orders of those appointed over me…” It is “…to follow the LAWFUL orders of those appointed over me…” That one little word makes for a whole world of difference. Unfortunately, that word also leaves open interpretation. What is a lawful order, verses an unlawful order? What we consider to be lawful or unlawful may very well be considered the opposite to those in power, and though we have the right to act against that which we consider unlawful, we must also, then, deal with the consequences that would arise from those above us taking the opposite view. No change is going to come from any single one of us finally deciding to enforce our Oath and taking individual action. It would be a flash in the pan, and soon forgotten… if it would even be reported on at all. Hell, even if it WERE reported, it would be presented as “domestic terrorism” giving them more ammunition against we pesky Constitutionalists. Nothing is going to happen until those of us that agree reach out to each other and plan a unified course of action. You can’t expect an individual to stand up to the consequences that would ensue, but we as a whole could take on the consequences… IF we ever decided to act as a whole.

  2. 09/05/2015 08:52

    That word “LAWFUL” does put the proper perspective on the whole thing, doesn’t it?

  3. 09/05/2015 09:54

    Reblogged this on BPI reblog001.

  4. 09/05/2015 17:53

    Thanks, boudica.

  5. 09/06/2015 07:51

    I know you’re being rhetorical but I will try.

    The reason we now have the disaster is because about 75 years ago the two “opposition” parties essentially melded in the throes of the “great” depression. They came to the consensus clandestinely that the American people had to be controlled for their own good and that only they had the answer even though by all honest accounts their every move just more firmly entrenched what was a mere business cycle down turn into a true economic disaster.

    They are as Caroll Quigley once proposed that they are just different enough to fool the ignorant into thinking they can throw the bums out and get a materially different approach.

    We cannot. Understand this- when the alleged “conservative” Dwight Eisenhower came to power he had no intention of undoing the “New Deal” bargain made by Roosevelt and Wilkie during the 1940 campaign. Wilkie was another New Dealer who just questioned Roosevelt’s efficiency not his vision. Today’s republican party is not a party of small government and hasn’t been since Coolidge. The “Democrat” party is the party of Government Expansion and the “Republican” role is to give it bi-partisan imprimatur by actually trying to make it work efficiently. After all what was Romney’s primary claim to fame. Making expensive boondoggles work. Not coming in and shutting them down.

    Now we see the fruits of this collusion. Ever expanding theft by government and a clear contempt for the rule of law as set down by the only truly innovative regime instituted since the Magna Carta.

    The history of the governance of human beings is generally that of a politically connected elite ruling over the ignorant masses. The basic premise being the subjects served the state.
    Our founding stood this on its head making the state subservient to citizen and only given the power to adjudicate between citizens equal in the eyes of the law. Our founding with one glaring exception(since corrected) made clear the intrinsic worth of each man and defined his rights as things that one can exercise in an unlimited fashion without making claims or infringing on the rights of others.

    But I digress.

    They made this pact with the idea that both sides were going to do as the pleased rule of law be damned. This required that they never call out the other for their clear lawlessness. Now the “Democrats” have been the primary violators especially under Obama. But he can’t do this unless the other side is in on the deal.

    They sell us out on the border. They sell us out on Iran. They sell us out defenstrating Obamacare. Sell us out on our God given rights so they can manufacture rights for a belligerent micro-nority. They sell us out on funding a barbarous baby chop shop. They sell us out on allowing the governing party to harass us because we don’t agree to their lawlessness. They gaslight us on a pseudo-religion that seeks to enslave us.

    These are all bi partisan efforts by the ruling monoparty. The supposed opposition party is gutless as they constantly allow the mortal sins of a truly evil amalgam of hate groups impose their ruthless depravity on this society all so they can get a nice write up in the propaganda organs of their de facto “betters”.

    If these people were truly on the side of the rule of law Obama would be in the dock with a bill of particulars two reams of paper high. It would not matter one whit whether they could remove him or because the numbers aren’t there as they would make it clear that these are gross violations of the law and any vote to retain him would be considered aiding and abetting an overthrow of the American republic. But they don’t because they tacitly agree with their senior partners. It doesn’t matter how egregious the policy or corruption encrusted their candidates are the so called “opposition party” not only does not attack their senior partners they openly attack those that have the temerity to openly question these people. Issue after issue you have the so called opposition party running interference for the NDSWP that it reminds one of the Vichy French in North Africa.

    Both parties have been long infested with the “progressive” disease for generations now. And by “progressive” I mean the reactionary idea of the dominance of the state. They have both long ago eschewed the idea of God given rights for the idea of state granted privileges. Their basic problem is we the people as many of us actually believe in the constitutional premise of the government as neutral arbiter not self-interested player; government as protector of God given rights from usurpers foreign and domestic not crony dispensers of favors to the connected.

    So why does Obama remain? Because they are all in on the scam and that includes the brass perfumed princes who now infest the upper reaches of the military who take an oath to protect and defend the constitution but in actuality have privately sworn fealty to traitor in the White House.

  6. 09/06/2015 08:45

    *SIGH* I know. Forgive my outburst of foolish optimism and anger.
    “What have you given us?”
    “A Republic, madame, if you can keep it.”
    I so preferred the “and it harm none, do as thou wilt” concept.

  7. 09/06/2015 08:56

    “I so preferred the “and it harm none, do as thou wilt” concept.”

    That is no longer allowed. Just like in 1984 they don’t just want you to comply but to venerate their every action.

    The whole of the left is an exercise in narcissism. They mentally cannot understand or even imagine the depths of the damage they create. Their main fall back is that their intentions, based on their pseudo religion, are good. But as I have previously said if you keep on doing the same thing and causing the same misery at some point your only intentions are focused on how they make YOU feel not how they affect your target.

    Hell on earth is paved with such intentions.

    Or as CS Lewis said:

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good
    of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live
    under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
    The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may
    at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good
    will torment us without end for they do so with the approval
    of their own conscience.”

    At least those who interfered through religious organizations actually have some introspection as to efficacy. Not so of those who are the voice of their own god.

  8. 09/06/2015 09:07

    This is nothing but monarchist behavior, with different titles for the social positions.

  9. 09/06/2015 10:25

    Too true.

    The only difference being they have substituted their less than stellar judgement for the divine right of kings.

    They really are reactionaries who need to make a movie: “Forward to the Past”.

  10. 09/06/2015 23:21

    Roger that shit. “Progressive”? Recessive.

  11. 09/08/2015 22:37

    You make me feel as though I actually found something solid. Thank you.

  12. 09/08/2015 22:38

    I know it is often days between my posts these days, but I appreciate the watching for them.

  13. 09/08/2015 22:38


  14. poetopoet permalink
    09/13/2015 06:52

    FX Phillips permalink
    09/06/2015 07:51

    I bow to you. This is the first I have seen of this. That is, you’re Greek culture contraband you posted here, that is right on.

  15. 09/14/2015 09:55

    Good you like that.


  1. BPI reblog001 Daily Archives: September 5, 2015 | boudicabpi2015
  2. BPI reblog001 Daily Archives: September 5, 2015 | Boudica BPI Weblog
  3. BPI reblog001 Daily Archives: September 5, 2015 | Boudica2015

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: