As to that thought about the 2A
It really couldn’t be much simpler. During the 1st Congress, when the actual Constitution was written, some of the Founders insisted on the Ten Amendments to guarantee FREEDOM, and seriously limit the powers of said Fed.
Why? We had just gotten done with a war to eliminate a tyrannical government/king not that long ago. The Constitution itself stated those things which the government must do, but it said nothing really about limiting those powers from expanding. Even then, EVEN THEN, there were those who didn’t want those limitations. They wanted the ability to grow and develop more power over the people of the new United States. But there were those who wanted to maintain this new found freedom, and there were enough to push through these limitations on the government.
Not, mind you, that there have not always been those who have slid in laws and so forth that have enabled their growth. And oppression of the people.
The 1st Amendment, freedom of speech and religion, was to enable the people to know what was going on so they could raise electoral hell with their representatives. Tell the fed what WTP wanted as a whole, and vote them out if need be.
The 2nd Amendment was immediately after the 1st as a warning that “If you don’t listen, we can reset this whole mess. Tread carefully, bitches”, or much to that effect.
From there we go to the realization that that whole 1776 thing pretty much got started by a group of regular citizens who got together to fight for their freedom. The King’s men came to take away the fighting tools of said people, and said people told them to go away in no uncertain terms. With said fighting tools.
Now, what kind of government would not think it was a good idea to disarm the public. Yes, that was a period, not a question mark. That is the simplicity of it. So obvious it is a statement not a question.
I heard another thing as well. RINOs (obviously) that have gone Clinton. I’ll get on that here in just a minute. Now, there may be exceptions, but anti-gun is near universal on the left. Those who have switched obviously (again) were never really on the right.
Let me use the search term Republicans saying they will vote Clinton. A few names, mostly the justification. Let me add to that term “Names of”. What came up was: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/30/heres-the-growing-list-of-big-name-republicans-supporting-hillary-clinton/
And you know exactly what will happen. What needs to be done is a purge of DC. Ballot box? God I hope so. Am I suggesting we use the Ultimate Constitutional Reset? I pray that not be necessary. But that’s why it’s there, and that’s why they are trying so hard to take away our ability to do it.
Get your ass to the polls. Shame we can’t vote multiple times like they do, but what we can do is outnumber the level of fraud you know they will try. The numbers need to be so big it strikes fear into their “hearts”. The voter ID thing would have helped a lot, but you notice the left wing courts have done everything to suppress that. Wait a damn minute. How do you cash that welfare check? How do you buy alcohol or cigarettes? Why would you be allowed to vote without the need for that same ID?